Alright. Enough of the conversation, may I now endeavour to push back the barriers of darkness.
First of all I am a great admirer of the game of baseball. My mother played baseball when she was at University in Melbourne. And I played Baseball when I was in the Army. I wasn’t very good at it but I enjoyed it. Baseball is an exciting game. It is, with cricket, one of the great ‘bat-and-ball’ games.
But allow me to elucidate.
All ‘bat-and-ball’ games have a few basics. One team has a ball and they throw it at a member of the other team and he/she hits the ball and tries to run a certain distance from one base to another. There are many ways that the batter can fail. If he hits the ball and the ball is caught without touching the ground he is ‘out’. There are other ways to be out but that will do for now.
The batter can score a point by running from one base to another- cricket – or from one base to a home base – baseball.
I do not need to explain much more than this.
In baseball the average number of home runs scored in any game is a bit more than 8. You can check here.
In the modern era, and I know some people have difficulty extracting themselves from the mire of the past, there are three forms of cricket.
The first form of the game is Twenty20.
In this game the batting side of 11 attempts to score as many runs as possible from 120 balls. The teams then swap places and the other team attempts to score the same number of runs plus one. In Twenty20 the average number of runs scored in any game is a bit more than 300′.
A typical Twenty20 game is completed in about three hours, with each innings lasting around 75–90 minutes and a 10–20-minute interval. This is much shorter than previously-existing forms of the game, and is closer to the time span of other popular team sports. It was introduced to create a fast-paced form of the game which would be attractive to spectators at the ground and viewers on television.
The second form of the game is One Day or 50/50. In this game the batting side has to score as many runs as possible from Fifty overs. An over consists of one bowler, bowling six balls in a group, followed by another bowler bowling a further six and so on, for a total of 300 balls.
In One Day games many teams can score over 300 runs in their 50 overs but the scores range considerably from 100 to 400.
Both of these forms of the game are exciting and interesting just as many games of baseball are exciting and interesting.
But how can a game where less than ten runs can be witnessed in the whole match be exciting and interesting? The answer is because the tension that is built up becomes infectious. The skill of the pitcher trying to outwit the batter becomes infectious. The batters trying to steal a base and so getting closer and closer to home is also infectious.
But all these are games. I repeat they are games.
But I wasn’t talking about games. I was talking about Test Cricket.
There are differences.
Test cricket is something that should be a part of the United Nations.
Test cricket is a battle between two nations, a war if you wish, where the combatants are not killed. There are threats made. The Prime Minister of the relevant Host nation is always in attendance. National well being is advanced. The winner takes the prize.
But
and it is a big ‘BUT’, because for the loser there will be another war fought in another two or three or four years. And again there will be no civilian deaths. There will be no drone strikes with multitudes of co-lateral damage.
Let me tell of a fictional international situation and you ask yourself what the result might be.
Let’s assume that there was a large colony of a powerful old nation.
This large colony had a large population with some very disparate religious groupings.
After much internal strife the large colony was granted independence.
After much more strife this large area was broken up into different areas and eventually there came about four separate nations. Between the two larger nations there existed a wonderful smaller area which both nations claimed should be a part of theirs.
The two larger nations had their own religion and each religion was almost completely and utterly in compatible. Not only that each of these two nations had a large and competent military structure.
The question I asked you was this: Would these two nations go to war?
The answer is: Almost certainly.
But if we look at India and Pakistan and the disputed area known as Kashmir, then these two countries have sat on their guns pointed across borders for the last Seventy Years.
But there has never been an all out war between the two.
Now I know I am drawing a long bow here, and I trust you will allow me this latitude, but there is no doubt, in all seriousness that India cannot go to war with Pakistan if there is a TEST MATCH series to be played.
I will give you an example.
When I was in the Army in the early Seventies we had a visit from some Indian Army Officers. At the time there was a cross-border standoff in the Himalayan Mountains between India and Pakistan. We were watching an Australian-England Test Match on the TV in the Officers Mess and one of the Indian Majors was relating how he was on the front line at the same time as an India-Pakistan Test was being played. He said that although The Indian Base could get radio coverage of the match the Pakistan Army Unit was unable to hear anything. It was therefore decided that they would lay a line from the Indian Base to the Pakistani Base so that everyone could keep up with the score. During the whole series only a few token angry shots were fired, although neither High Commands would ever confirm this matter.
To sum: Test Cricket may at times be as exciting as watching paint dry, and if you are of that opinion then there is little more I can do.
But one or two of you might be able to say that it is a lot better to watch paint dry, than for two great nations to go to war where millions would die.
Foot Note.
If anyone living in Europe, who has never seen a cricket match I have given a link for the Cricket Organisations for Belgium, France and Germany. If you go on line you will certainly be able to find a club where you could go and watch.
http://cricket.de/ This is the web site for the German Cricket Association.
It’s the perfect game for summer. Leave the tv/radio on all day, you don’t HAVE to sit & watch it from start to finish but if you hear a wicket quickly run from the garden/jump out of the pool/wake up from snoozing on the couch but get back to the tv watch the next over & then carry on with your day 🏏 ☀️ 😎
LikeLiked by 4 people
The coverage is drifting up the hallway from our living room to my study. I can hear, “ooooohhh, touch and go, the hand’s come off the bat . . . ” So to extrapolate your theory, does that mean no one is pushing the red button just yet? You KNOW what I mean.
LikeLiked by 2 people
No one is pushing the red button, but it would be a better world if a few other countries played test cricket. Yes, I know what you mean.
If you have a spare minute you might like to read this.
https://wp.me/s6LpSr-silences
I don’t think you have seen it before.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks for directing me to that. I’ve commented over there.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I refuse to join in this lot Gwen!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Just two bits of trivia. Some say the World Series was named after the New York World newspaper, which may explain the use of the word world.
One of our daughters has just become the first woman ever to play in the Vietnam Cricket Association.
LikeLiked by 7 people
Point One. It doesn’t change the fact that isn’t a WORLD series
Point Two. Wow, Fantastic and well done and isn’t that great.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Of course, it’s not a WORLD series, but it was most likely named after a world something. Cricket is much more worldly. Soccer too.
As for Petra and her cricket career in Vietnam, we are so thrilled for her. Apparently the club had to decide whether to include her. They said yes, and she bowled the third top player on the opposition. She’s signed up to be playing from December.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Congrats on your daughter’s achievement! 🤗
LikeLiked by 3 people
Great post!
There are 10 ways to be given out in cricket (there used to be 11 but ‘handled the ball’ was removed from the list in 2017). My favourite is ‘timed out’ and I bet a few batsmen in the 1970s would have chosen that rather than face the West Indian paceman.
The football World Cup wasn’t really a World event until 1982, until then only 16 teams took part!
LikeLiked by 4 people
Did you see Peggy’s comment. One of our daughters has just become the first woman ever to play in the Vietnam Cricket Association.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I saw that, how brilliant. I quite like watching Women’s cricket!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, Andrew, I also quite like watching Women
LikeLiked by 5 people
Lots of countries used to compete in the group stages though, and then not reach the finals. In 1966, for example, 72 countries took part from the very beginning of the competition.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Good point, I had overlooked the qualifying stages!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great article, Paol. I have tried to keep my cricket stories to the minimum, but I bet no-one else has ever seen six leg byes. https://derrickjknight.com/2012/06/17/six-leg-byes/
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you Derrick. I went back and had a look at your earlier post and thought of Joe Root who, today, collected a bouncer on his head. These days if your helmet is struck you have to get a new one sent out and the doctor comes and waves her finger in front of your eyes and you nod ( if you are Joe Root) and get on with the game. I think he is turning into a very special England captain.
LikeLiked by 4 people
He is, Paol. Thanks for going back to read about Ethan and Len
LikeLiked by 1 person
To save me from having to do an online search, why in heck is Twenty20 called that, if there are are 120 balls thrown (or 240 for both teams)? Or is it just another of those cricket things?
Yes, I get what you’re saying about world peace and cricket … Too bad North Korea, the USA and Russia (and other countries) aren’t involved.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sorry. My fault. There are six balls in an over. So 20 overs of 6 balls = 120.
A bit of trivia for anyone who is an Italian Freak (If you will excuse the term ) Did you know that the Milano football team A.C. Milan is (or was) officially called the Athletic and Cricket Club of Milan.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I did wonder about the A.C. bit, John. I have a couple of friends who are fans of the game and that club.
LikeLiked by 2 people
This explanation was as clear as mud to me, however I totally understand the love for this game by the folks over the ponds.
I do think that maybe our wars should be fought via a cricket match! So many less casualties 😉
LikeLiked by 3 people
Excellent work! We’ll convert them all eventually.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hullo. And thank you for this post! Interesting. I know cricket is taken quite seriously, but I have not thought of it as serving an actual serious function, of being a substitute for deathly combat. I like this point. Humans are odd creatures, aren’t they? This is interesting, and I will probably think about it for the rest of the day and even longer, how something relatively benign can fill the space of body- and soul-killing war, on all scales, from individuals to nations.
And yes, america calls everything about itself “world.” I’ve long noticed that. Very arrogant, indeed. The nation is quite closed, like a human that has never travelled and cannot imagine a world outside its own four worlds. That’s what america is like.
I do appreciate this interesting, thought-provoking post.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you Pamela, I am glad to have your feedback.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Here is a handy explanation of cricket:
You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man that’s in the side that’s in goes out, and when he’s out he comes in and the next man goes in until he’s out. When they are all out, the side that’s out comes in and the side thats been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out.
When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out, and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes in. There are two men called umpires who stay all out all the time and they decide when the men who are in are out.
When both sides have been in and all the men have out, and both sides have been out twice after all the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end of the game!
Clear?
This one copied from:
http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/page/429550.html
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yes Ankur, I don’t know how old it is but one of my teachers gave it to us in school more than 50 years ago, And it still makes me chuckle
LikeLiked by 3 people
Likewise. Someone got it and published it in our school magazine in the early eighties. I have almost verbatim remembered it ever since.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Nice story.
LikeLiked by 2 people